Skip to content

Conversation

@ArgoZhang
Copy link
Member

@ArgoZhang ArgoZhang commented Nov 13, 2024

make TValue as nullable

Summary of the changes (Less than 80 chars)

简单描述你更改了什么, 不超过80个字符;如果有关联 Issue 请在下方填写相关编号

Description

fixes #4650

Regression?

  • Yes
  • No

[If yes, specify the version the behavior has regressed from]

[是否影响老版本]

Risk

  • High
  • Medium
  • Low

[Justify the selection above]

Verification

  • Manual (required)
  • Automated

Packaging changes reviewed?

  • Yes
  • No
  • N/A

☑️ Self Check before Merge

⚠️ Please check all items below before review. ⚠️

  • Doc is updated/provided or not needed
  • Demo is updated/provided or not needed
  • Merge the latest code from the main branch

Summary by Sourcery

Enhancements:

  • Refactor components to allow TValue to be nullable, enhancing flexibility in handling null values.

@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This PR refactors the generic type parameter TValue to be nullable across multiple components in the BootstrapBlazor library. The changes primarily involve updating method signatures and parameter types to support nullable TValue, ensuring better null handling throughout the component hierarchy.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Updated base component classes to support nullable TValue
  • Modified ValueChanged EventCallback to accept nullable TValue
  • Updated ValueExpression to use nullable TValue
  • Changed FormatValueAsString method signature to accept nullable parameter
  • Modified CurrentValue property to be nullable
src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Display/DisplayBase.cs
src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Validate/ValidateBase.cs
Updated input-related components to handle nullable values
  • Modified Formatter delegate to accept nullable input
  • Updated OnIncrement and OnDecrement callbacks to handle nullable values
  • Modified value formatting and conversion methods to handle null cases
src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Input/BootstrapInputBase.cs
src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/InputNumber/BootstrapInputNumber.razor.cs
Updated specialized components to support nullable values
  • Modified FormatValueAsString implementations to handle nullable inputs
  • Updated value conversion and formatting logic to safely handle null values
src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Checkbox/CheckboxList.razor.cs
src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/DateTimePicker/DateTimePicker.razor.cs
src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Radio/RadioList.razor.cs
src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Select/MultiSelect.razor.cs
src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Transfer/Transfer.razor.cs

Assessment against linked issues

Issue Objective Addressed Explanation
#4650 Make TValue parameter nullable in Display and related components

Possibly linked issues


Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@bb-auto bb-auto bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 13, 2024
@bb-auto bb-auto bot added this to the v9.0.0 milestone Nov 13, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @ArgoZhang - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • Please document the testing approach used to verify these changes, including which components were tested and any edge cases considered, since this modification affects multiple core components.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (573ed26) to head (59c7be9).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #4651   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          620       620           
  Lines        27419     27419           
  Branches      3928      3928           
=========================================
  Hits         27419     27419           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ArgoZhang ArgoZhang merged commit 4b33dae into main Nov 13, 2024
5 checks passed
@ArgoZhang ArgoZhang deleted the refactor-value branch November 13, 2024 03:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

refactor(Display): make TValue as nullable

2 participants